[Archived in
Entry]
[Richard Bluestein's Weblog] i need some urgent g5 buying advice - wich model do I go for 2, 2.3 or 2.7ghz - big difference in price between these models and would i really notice the difference ? my other dilema do i buy one 23" cinema display or two 20" displays for the same price ? I can't afford two 23" help please helpppppppppp. what G5 does madge use ?
Some slightly related from Technorati and Google.
[Forums.macrumors.com] Mac Forums - WWDC Product Releases?: i just took delivery on a rev. b dual 1.8 w/ 256mb ram (upgraded it myself to 1.25 gigs), 80 gig hd (slapped in another 200 gig sata for video), 128mb ati 9600XT, logitech mx900 bluetooth mouse and logitech z-2200 thx speakers- a new 20" apple lcd is all i need to complete this awesome system!!!
[Macworld.com] Editors' Notes Weblog: The Mac mini: Comparing Apples and Oranges ...: As for the 3000, it's indeed a better computer (and a better value, overall, in my opinion). Once you configure it to similar specs as the $599 Mac mini (for around $640 without monitor), the Dell has FireWire, a bit more RAM, and a faster processor. On the other hand, it still has inferior graphics and shared memory, along with all the software shortcomings discussed in my final "Apples and Oranges" article that will make it significantly more expensive in the long run. In other words, the Dell 3000 fares much better than the 2400 in comparison, but it's more expensive than the 2400 and it still doesn't match up to the Mac mini as a complete system (in my opinion for the target market).
[Macworld.com] Editors' Notes Weblog: The Mac mini: Comparing Apples and Oranges ...: As for the 3000, it's indeed a better computer (and a better value, overall, in my opinion). Once you configure it to similar specs as the $599 Mac mini (for around $640 without monitor), the Dell has FireWire, a bit more RAM, and a faster processor. On the other hand, it still has inferior graphics and shared memory, along with all the software shortcomings discussed in my final "Apples and Oranges" article that will make it significantly more expensive in the long run. In other words, the Dell 3000 fares much better than the 2400 in comparison, but it's more expensive than the 2400 and it still doesn't match up to the Mac mini as a complete system (in my opinion for the target market).
[Macworld.com] Editors' Notes Weblog: The Mac mini: Comparing Apples and Oranges ...: As for the 3000, it's indeed a better computer (and a better value, overall, in my opinion). Once you configure it to similar specs as the $599 Mac mini (for around $640 without monitor), the Dell has FireWire, a bit more RAM, and a faster processor. On the other hand, it still has inferior graphics and shared memory, along with all the software shortcomings discussed in my final "Apples and Oranges" article that will make it significantly more expensive in the long run. In other words, the Dell 3000 fares much better than the 2400 in comparison, but it's more expensive than the 2400 and it still doesn't match up to the Mac mini as a complete system (in my opinion for the target market).
Reflected tags on Technorati: Blog, Videoblogging, Digital Video Info
Posted at May 30, 2005 10:10 AM
This is